|
Even with conservation, purchases from independent power producers, and reinvestment in existing generation assets, we will need to explore additional sources of power in British Columbia that can provide a large, dependable supply of electricity throughout the year. BC Hydro remains committed to investigating all large-scale options that can fulfill the BC Energy Plan's goal of providing clean energy to British Columbians. Our province is fortunate to have several resource options, including hydroelectric dams, biomass facilities, clean coal facilities (not yet available) or natural gas plants. Each option presents unique advantages and disadvantages. Analysis of energy alternatives is generally done as part of BC Hydro's energy planning process, which incorporates developing Integrated Electricity Plans (IEP) and Long-Term Acquisition Plans (LTAP) on a regular basis. Both plans are filed with the British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC) for review and consideration. In 2006, BC Hydro prepared a combined 2006 IEP/LTAP, and Site C was identified as an attractive potential resource option. Some stakeholders, however, expressed interest in having updated information about Site C, through project-specific studies and consultation, before being able to compare Site C to energy alternatives. BC Hydro filed its 2008 LTAP in June which includes a description of energy options for meeting B.C.'s long term electricity needs. As part of the Stage 2 review of Site C, BC Hydro is seeking input from stakeholders and the public about key factors to consider in evaluating Site C as a potential resource option. A summary of energy options, and their attributes, are summarized in the table below. | B.C.'s Potential Electricity Resources | Resource | Financial Cost | Energy Quality and Capacity | Environmental Impact | | | Air* | Land | Water |
|---|
| Conservation | Low operating cost
No fuel cost
Can require initial capital investment | Reliable reduction in firm energy requirements
Reliable reduction in dependable capacity requirements | None | None | None | Small hydro (run-of-river) | Low operating cost
Water rentals
Large initial capital investment | Intermittent - seasonal Low dependable capacity | None | Affects wildlife habitat, traditional and recreational uses | Diverts a portion of stream flow; may impact recreational uses | Large hydro (such as Site C) | Low operating cost
Water rentals
Large initial capital investment | Flexible, firm energy
Dependable capacity | Minimal | Affects wildlife habitat, traditional and recreational uses, agriculture | Changes portion of river flooded; may affect flows downstream and fish habitat | | Natural gas** | Low operating cost
Significant fuel cost
Moderate capital investment | Flexible, firm energy
Dependable capacity | Nitrous oxides largely controllable; carbon dioxide emissions must be offset | Limited to plant site | Consumptive water use | | Clean coal | Even split between fuel cost (coal) and service on capital | Firm, base-load energy
Dependable capacity | Some sulphur oxide or mercury emissions; carbon dioxide emissions must be captured | Footprint would include mine and transportation infrastructure | Consumptive water use | | Geothermal | Low operating cost
No fuel cost
Large initial capital investment | Reliable, firm energy
Dependable capacity | None | Limited to plant site | Consumptive water use | | Wind | Low operating cost
No fuel cost
Large initial capital investment | Intermittent
Low dependable capacity | None | Visual impact of towers and may affect wildlife such as bats and birds | Potential impacts on ocean floor, mammals and fisheries at some offshore sites | | Biomass | Low operating cost
Low to moderate fuel cost
Large initial capital investment | Firm, base-load energy
Dependable capacity | Dependent upon fuel burned; possible local air impacts | Limited to plant site | Consumptive water use | | Solar | Low operating cost
No fuel cost
Large initial capital investment | Intermittent
Low dependable capacity | None | Utilizes buildings; no change to existing footprint | None | | Tidal | Moderate operating cost
No fuel cost
Large initial capital investment | Intermittent
Low dependable capacity | None | Limited to powerhouse footprint | May affect fish, marine mammals and fishing operations |
*Based on emissions during operation. However, all resources except conservation have a greenhouse gas impact during construction and filling of reservoirs (for hydro with storage). **The BC Energy Plan mandated that 90 per cent of total electricity continues to be clean or renewable, which means no more than 10 per cent may be generated through options such as coal or natural gas.
| | |