BCUC Information Request Responses (1-25)

Print This Page

Responses 1 - 25

• 1.01.1 Details "economically efficient decisions" [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.01.2 Demand decisions impacted by Heritage Contract proposal  [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.02.0 Heritage Deferral Account re economic incentives [PDF, 47 Kb]
• 1.03.0 Provisions of HC that might fetter communications [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.04.1 Implications of "allocation by customer class" [PDF, 161 Kb]
• 1.04.2 How HC benefits allocated if load growth not same over time [PDF, 42 Kb]
• 1.05.0 Does deferral account include adjustment for 'Trade Income' [PDF, 101 Kb]
• 1.06.1 Components of proposal understood as comprehensive package [PDF, 48 Kb]
• 1.06.2 Calculations of price contract at CPI-BC and Heritage Energy [PDF, 47 Kb]
• 1.07.0 How BCH Gen will ensure priority is given to the needs of BCH Dist [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.08.1 How does 49,000 GWh compare with domestic load [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.08.2 If BCH Dist does not take all Heritage Energy, then "bankable"? [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.08.3 Is the 49,000 GWh per year to be adjusted annually? [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.09.1 HC will also allow coordination with which other resources? [PDF, 43 Kb]
• 1.09.2 Benefits of "coordination with other resources" [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.09.3 What kind of coordination is necessary or desirable? [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.10.1 How is 'average water' defined? [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.10.2 Time period used for examining historic capability of resources [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.10.3 Factors considered in determining future expected use resources [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.10.4 BCH rationale for inclusion of thermal resources in the 49,000 GWH/year [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.11.1 Limits or constraints proposed for cost of Heritage Electricity [PDF, 43 Kb]
• 1.11.2 Cost reviewed separately or at same time from costs of BCH Distribution [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.12.1 What changes made to HC to accommodate a PBR Plan [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.12.2 Will BCH file a PBR Plan for HPO as part of 2004 Revenue Requirement [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.13.1 How BCH will separate energy transactions as it proposes [PDF, 76 Kb]
• 1.13.2 Examples illustrate distinction btw 'domestic purposes' vs 'trading activities' [PDF, 55 Kb]
• 1.13.3 REV Determining market index price for transactions btw Powerex and BCH [PDF, 162 Kb]
• 1.13.4.0 Historical summary of market index over the last 10 yrs [PDF, 80 Kb]
• 1.13.4.1 Sumas Price Index [PDF, 1.4 Mb]
• 1.13.4.2 Mid Columbia On-Peak Index [PDF, 1.5 Mb]
• 1.13.4.3 Mid Columbia Off - Peak Index [PDF, 1.3 Mb]
• 1.14.1 How does BC Hydro define and measure "surplus capability"? [PDF, 46 Kb]
• 1.14.2 Recorded energy trade re hourly transactions and contract commitments [PDF, 43 Kb]
• 1.14.3 Transactions to which the index would apply [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.14.4 Powerex's costs with Heritage resources, spot and contract sales [PDF, 43 Kb]
• 1.14.5 To what extent will Powerex sell export energy under fixed term contracts [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.15.1 Rationale for change in definition of Trade Income [PDF, 36 Kb]
• 1.15.2 How proposed change in definition will impact ratepayers [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.15.3.0 BCH's June 30 2000 ltr to BCUC and Report on Export Trade [PDF, 98 Kb]
• 1.15.3.1 RoET Report on Expot Trade [PDF, 684 Kb]
• 1.15.4 Does ltr and Report accurately reflect current relationship btw BCH and Powerex. [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.15.5 How relationship will change if HC proposal adopted by Province [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.16.1 Difference btw index and sale price a debit or credit to Trade Income account [PDF, 50 Kb]
• 1.16.2 Why other energy sales should not be credited back as with surplus hydro [PDF, 45 Kb]
• 1.17.0 There is no BCUC IR#1.17.0 [PDF, 8 Kb]
• 1.18.1 Proposed Heritage Deferral Account vs current RSA [PDF, 78 Kb]
• 1.18.2 Impact change in deferral account will have on dividends to Province [PDF, 42 Kb]
• 1.19.0 Historical volatility of 'cost of energy' and 'Trade Income' [PDF, 129 Kb]
• 1.20.1 Average system capability of Hydro Quebec system[PDF, 73 Kb]
• 1.20.2 Why direct application of HQ model means greater costs for Heritage Beneficiaries [PDF, 46 Kb]
• 1.20.3 How much a fixed quantity based on HQ model would cost Heritage Beneficiaries [PDF, 64 Kb]
• 1.21.1 Powerex re how BC Hydro’s system is operated[PDF, 46 Kb]
• 1.21.2 What info does Powerex provide to BCH for decision making [PDF, 47 Kb]
• 1.22.0 Copy of the document 'Making the Connection' [PDF, 42 Kb]
• 1.22.1 MtC April 2002 [PDF, 1.7 Mb]
• 1.23.1 Detail on derivation of maximum energy supply obligation [PDF, 47 Kb]
• 1.23.2 Simulation studies re degree of accuracy with simulation model [PDF, 44 Kb]
• 1.24.1 Report of hydroelectric and Burrard Thermal generation last 20 yrs [PDF, 116 Kb]
• 1.24.2.0 Distribution around forecast average generation capabiltiy [PDF, 19 Kb]
• 1.24.2.1 DoHGen Distribution of Hydro Generation [PDF, 1.1 Kb]
• 1.25.1 Adjustment to Kootenay Canal data b/c of system optimization benefits [PDF, 46 Kb]
• 1.25.2 Quantify 'small average energy benefit from the Keenleyside Entitlement Agreement' [PDF, 45 Kb]