| Document | Date Filed |
| Broadband |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_001_01 to 1_015_01 [PDF, 1.6 Mb] | December 21, 2004 |
| Dial-up |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_001_01 Use of lower TGVI estimates and cost effective Tier 1 proposal [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_001_02 GSX approval from an EPA for DPP [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_001_03 Penalties or costs incurred by BCH under contract with GSX PL if TGVI confirmed as fuel source for DPP [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_001_04 Costs pertaining to GSX re cost effectiveness for BCH and ratepayers [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_001_05 Validity of CFT outcomes as currently projected if TGVI not confirmed as fuel source for DPP [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_002_01 Effect of 2008 date on cost effectiveness forecasts [PDF, 57 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_002_02 Why only later dates used if in service date of 2008 possible [PDF, 53 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_003_01 Different assumptions re pricing for Tier 1 and Tier 2 and No Award options [PDF, 63 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_003_02 Why base case assume 2010 in_service date for 230kV cables [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_004_01 Credit applied to options for deferral of next 230kV cable [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_004_02 Removal of a transmission deferral credit from CFT evaluation process [PDF, 21 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_005_01 Uncertainty over actual installation of cable or just timing [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_005_02 Relative cost benefit of delay in 230kV cable for Tier 1 and planned in_service date [PDF, 55 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_005_03 Relative cost benefit for other options of expediting 230kV cable in_service date [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_006_01 Higher gas prices and lower Mainland generation costs [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_006_02 If higher gas prices are considered unlikely [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_006_03 If higher gas prices are considered likely [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_007_01 Low Electricity demand_cost and link to High Gas forecast [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_007_02 Stress tests of base case scenario [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_007_03 Forecast with High Gas_High Electricity scenario [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_008_01 Forecast period [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_008_02 Impact on electricity prices from thermal generation on VI [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_009_01 If high gas prices on VI result in higher electricity rates [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_009_02_009_03 Current energy demand projections [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_010_01 Fixed prices [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_010_02 NCDMP proposal to BCUC re proj no 3698376 [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_010_03 Extent NCDMP option mitigate uncertainty over installation of 230kV cables [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_011_01 NCDMP option and dependable capacity [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_012_01 CFT outcome and additional energy [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_012_02 Tier 1 and CFT outcome most capable of mitigating delay in 230kV cable [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_013_01 Estimate of 2004 date for implementation of NCDMP and apparent cost effectiveness [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_014_01 Base case captures one year delay in 230kV cable and other values re 2010 in_service date [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_014_02 Scenarios by identical cable in_service dates [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
| MCLENNAN IR 1_015_01 Possible increase in employment [PDF, 54 Kb] | December 21, 2004 |
