| Document | Date Filed |
| Broadband |
| GSXCCC IR 1_001_01 to GSXCCC IR 1_020_02 [PDF, 1.9 Mb] | December 20, 2004 |
| Dial-up |
| GSXCCC IR 1_001_01 confirm transmission system is not all planned to be zero rated in 2007 [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_001_02 how many mws of capacity will be eliminated when hvdc zero rated [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_001_03 confirm bch intends to keep hvdc line in service [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_002_01 reconcile statements about demand side resources and economic consequences of load shedding [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_003_01 confirm dpp is not a cogeneration facility [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_004_01 describe dpp vs vigp reference cft report pg 2 line 1_9 [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_005_01 does bch expect the bcuc to approve or disallow the epa in the course of review [PDF, 56 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_006_01 explain bch description of the cft process as being transparent [PDF, 56 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_007_01 reference cft report p 25 line 3_4 commission statement [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_008_01 confirm that bch will not suffer financial penalty if bcuc disallows all or part of epa [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_008_02 identify situations where bch might incur financial penalty [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_009_01 list factors causing qem to favour 150mw min portfolio size relative to 300mw size [PDF, 52 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_010_01 how many bidders accounted for the 6 vigp projects that prequalified [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_010_02 confirm 20 of 22 projects by prequalified bidders were natural gas based [PDF, 42Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_010_03 list capacities in mws of the 22 projects [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_010_04 how many projects did dpp or corporate affiliates propose [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_010_05 state reason for disqualification of bidder of coal plant wind farm and biomass coal plant [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_011_01 ref cft report p8 lines 22_26 how many detailed descriptions for proposed projects did 9 bidders provide [PDF, 43 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_011_02 how many projects were natural gas based [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_011_03 how many of proposed projects were vigp projects [PDF, 43 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_011_04 how many bidders accounted for vigp projects at this point [PDF, 43 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_011_05 list respective capacities of mws of proposed projects at this point [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_011_06 what is bchs understanding of the reason why 2 prequalified bidders didnt provide detailed descriptions [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_012_01 bch understanding of why three pre_qualified bidders did not submit tenders on 13aug04 [PDF, 56 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_012_02 natural gas based proposed projects [PDF, 43 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_012_03 natural gas based proposed projects after 2 bidders proposing 3 projs rejected due to non_compliance [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_012_04 confirm four tenders from four bidders proposing total of seven projects [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_012_05 of these 7 projs how many natural gas based [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_012_06 of 7 projs how many vigp projs [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_012_07 bidders accounted for vigp projs at this point [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_013_01 ten projs of which bidders of three were disqualified leaving seven projs [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_013_02 submission evaluation committee assessment [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_013_03 of 6 projs which passed sec assessment how many were natural gas based [PDF, 43 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_013_04 of 6 projs which passed sec assessment how many were vigp projs [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_013_05 of 6 projs which passed sec assessment how many proposed by dpp or corporate affiliates [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_014_01 does bch consider that the qem has met commissions request [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_015_01 clarify bch use of the term tender [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_016_01 how many separate portfolios assembled and assessed [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_016_02 REVISED number of included projs and portfolio capacity for each portfolio for which portfolio spreadsheet [PDF, 46 Kb] | January 5, 2005 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_016_03 how may portfolios for which portfolio spreadsheet was run contained vigp projs [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_017_01 table showing values for dppp in comparison with hypothetical plant in appendix h [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_018_01 active management of natural gas and electricity price exposure [PDF, 43 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_019_01 bch explanation of how dppp 50million less expensive than vigp benchmark [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_020_01 two smaller projs totaling 122mw and six proposed projs for which net tender cost determined [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| GSXCCC IR 1_020_02 fuel sources for each of two smaller projs comprising tier2 [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
