| Document | Date Filed |
| Broadband |
| BCUC IR 2_054_01 to 2_065_05 [PDF, 485 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| Dial-up |
| BCUC IR 2_054_01 why are demonstration tests required quarterly [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_054_02 is quarterly testing a requirement of the icp or model contracts [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_054_03 how often does icp require testing [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_055_01 REVISED provide annual average a_monthly for the last five years [PDF, 113 Kb] | January 11, 2005 |
| BCUC IR 2_055_02 can each biomass wood wind small run of river meet 97 percent standard [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_055_03 is the 97 percent standard applied only in peak season [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_055_04 explain consequences and reference clauses of seller failure to meet 97 percent standard [PDF, 57 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_056_01 justify bch retaining off site emission reduction rights and green rights [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_056_02 is 56_1 is approach balanced given that seller appears liable for cost increases due to changes in environ... [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_057_01 pls explain rationale of requiring seller to replace the plant if event occurs close to end of term [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_057_02 why is there no option for seller to terminate with a termination payment [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_057_03 pls rationalize this different primary term approach appendix 16 clause 11_3 last two sentences [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_057_04 pls rationalize 11_3 vs icp epa and other model contracts [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_058_01 why are obligations to pay monies are not excused by a force majeure missing in the epa [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_058_02 pls confirm the inability of seller to obtain permits is not an event of force majeure [PDF, 60 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_058_03 DPPLP Material Permits [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_058_04 what advantage would seller receive by electing the option of appendix 17 part n [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_058_05 Permit Risk DPPLP [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_058_06 Cost re lack of permits [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_058_07 why is bch inability to supply gas due to failure of firm upstream transportation not an event of force ma... [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_058_08 58_1 redacted 58_2 pls advise intent of clause 12 part b appendix 15 if gas is not available at huntington [PDF, 53 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_059_01 calculation for termination by seller post cod [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_059_02 describe intent of article 17_5b [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_01 why is sale of energy or capacity to a third party classified as a deliberate breach [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_02 why is the sale of energy to third parties so restrictive [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_03 if consent required under article 8_6c how would spot market sales be addressed [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_04 what proof would buyer expect that plant can operate at above 105 percent of nominal capacity [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_05 if it were summer why would buyer object to third party sales [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_06 plese explain the intent and working of part a 3 appendix 15 [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_07 which model contracts and icp take the same approach [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_08 why could seller not be permitted to sell such excess capacity or energy where no injury to buyer can be f... [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_060_09 does epa 8_6 discourage renewables [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_061_01 under what epa articles does seller have unlimited liability [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_061_02 would bch agree that if a seller is exposed to unduly high risks it may render the project unfinanceable [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_061_03 would liabilites or lds tend to increase costs charged by the epa contractor [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_061_04 pls compare terms of limits of liability for model contracts and icp epa [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_061_05 why could not bch provide an overall liability cap [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_061_06 why is unlimited liability required given step in rights under epa article 16 [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_061_07 what is bch approx financial exposure if plant failed completely [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_061_08 how many parties in the cft indicated that unlimited liability was a serious issue [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_062_01 what is approx mw output from duct firing [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_062_02 has bch included duct firing in the contracted capacity [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_062_03 why are lds in clause 9 not escalated for inflation [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_063_01 has responsibility for fuel procurement shifted from buyer to seller in renewal terms [PDF, 62 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_063_02 why are the lds in clause 9 not escalated for inflation given the 25 year lapse [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_064_01 DPPLP gas turbine generator [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_064_02 ICP is dual fuelled [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_064_03 pls advise net cost advantage disadvantage of duel fuel scenarios studied [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_065_01 do any epa provisions afford the seller relief from changes in cil post epa execution [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_065_02 why does the epa not contain a cil provision to apportion some risks to bch [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_065_03 what cost did bidders price into bids for cil risk [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_065_04 is it reasonable to take the green rights while leaving all project environmental cil to seller [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_065_05 how many parties in cft indicated that lack of cil coverage was a serious issue [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
