| Document | Date Filed |
| Broadband |
| BCUC IR 2_066_01 to 2_080_03 [PDF, 1.2 Mb] | December 20, 2004 |
| Dial-up |
| BCUC IR 2_066_01 what is the status of the gsx project and supply contracts for williams or other involved parties [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_067_01 mark up of generic epa showing all differences between the dpplp and epa [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_068_01 why is the improper draw clause in favour of the seller not included [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_068_02 identify items that impose on terasen a legal obligation to serve the dplpp with gas transportation services [PDF, 89 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_069_01 identify the parties in the cft process who dropped out after the march 5 issuance of addendum 10 [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_069_02 reasons for disqualifying 3 bidders mentioned in section 2_6 [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_069_03 are there 8 or 9 prequalified bidders [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_069_04 reasons for disqualifying 3 bidders mentioned in section 2_7 [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_069_05 why of 23 parties only 11 prequalified as of april 29 and only 4 were not disqualified for tendering [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_069_06 for 6 evaluated projects indicate type location and if they are vigp type projects [PDF, 54 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_069_07 does bch plan to obtain permits for backup generation [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_069_08 competitive process terms and conditions [PDF, 55 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_070_01 REVISED provide the documentation supporting the mandatory criteria regarding the successful bidder [PDF, 47 Kb] | January 12, 2005 |
| BCUC IR 2_070_02 rationalize mandatory requirement that permit conditions be satisfied before a contract will be signed [PDF, 52 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_070_03 did a contract occur between bidders and the inrv [PDF, 55 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_071_01 why was the inrv not required to examine the terms and conditions of the cft contracts [PDF, 85 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_071_01_Attachment_01 Invitation for Proposals Consulting Services [PDF, 747 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_072_01 summary tables for 10 projects originally tendered plus 3 rejected for non compliance [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_072_02 what assumption is made on ghg liability in the vigp benchmark [PDF, 53 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_072_03 tables for gas price forecast discount rate sensitivity and exchange rate sensitivity [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_072_04 summary tables for tender comparisons under electricity forecast [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_073_01 REVISED two summary tables comparing eia partial and eia full forecasts [PDF, 50 Kb] | January 6, 2005 |
| BCUC IR 2_073_02 REVISED tables comparing high gas low gas 6 and 10 percent discount and exchange rates [PDF, 50 Kb] | January 6, 2005 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_01 wecc guidelines that reference a 97 percent dependable capacity [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_02 wecc or industry guidelines dependable capacity minimum guarantee [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_03 bch minimum criteria for dependable capacity [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_04 icp availability and what dependable capacity assigned for planning purposes [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_05 in bch system what generation facility has a dependable capacity that is 50 percent of its nominal rating [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_06 bidders and changes to the guaranteed availability mandatory criterion in the cft [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_07 how many of 23 bidders cited guaranteed availability as too onerous [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_08 provide wecc benchmarks for the availability of coal fired generating stations [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_074_09 what is the natural gas supply guaranteed availability [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_075_01 length of time between synchronization and commercial operation date [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_075_02 length of time between commerical operation date and earliest date dpplp would serve winter peak load [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_075_03 in last 30 years what is earliest date that winter peak demand has been set [PDF, 4 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_075_04 is there a premium set for the length of time between cod and estimated earliest date for capacity [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_075_05 install tm2500 generator to serve winter peak load [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_075_06 ramifications of delaying project milestone schedule by 90 days [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_076_01 REVISED monthly invoices for capacity charges liquidated damages for jan 2008 to jan 2009 [PDF, 56 Kb] | January 12, 2005 |
| BCUC IR 2_077_01 temperature and humidity conditions for capacity and heat rate adjustment tables [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_078_01 Reductio of number of cold starts [PDF, 54 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_078_02 number of allowable cold starts [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_078_03 ramifications for exceeding number of cold starts warm starts or hot starts [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_079_01 Restrictions that limit serller's ability to declare reduced capacity [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_079_02 Duct firing system's natural gas requirements [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_080_01 compare in table form the epa vs epas for green energy and customer generation on dec 8 bch website [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_080_02 why was total constructive loss approach not used in epa article 11_3 [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_080_03 explain why industrial plant that offered epa under customer generation or greep ipp would receive more fa... [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
