| Document | Date Filed |
| Broadband |
| BCUC IR 2_045_01 to 2_053_03 [PDF, 2.9 Mb] | December 20, 2004 |
| Dial-up |
| BCUC IR 2_045_01 revise the peak demand forecast for VI on the basis of price elasticity [PDF, 52 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_045_02 if revision is based on peak elasticities does Model 1 Without Gas provide a significant coefficient [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_046_01 please explain the criteria that the no dual fuel project failed to meet [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_046_02 for the projects in tender f please provide the criteria that the no dual fuel project failed to meet [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_046_03 if projects in tenders d or f were used as part of tier 2 cost effectiveness study please identify [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_046_04 further to bcuc 14_0 round 1 repeat q 14_3 and 14_4 for a tier 2 biomass project only [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_046_05 if 46_5 is confidential provide total present value result and as much other summary info [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_046_06 if bcuc 14_3 and 14_4 confidential pls provide present values and other summary info for each scenario [PDF, 82 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_046_07 if ir 29_2 results in a refiled attachment a of appendix j pls provide spreadsheets for each cft outcome [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_01 pls provide estimate of tgvi annual cost to move gas [PDF, 65 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_02 if a completed tsa with tgvi is not available pls outline current state of negotiations [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_02_Attachment_01 Letter 9 Dec 04 from Fasken Martineau to BCUC re TGVI CPCN Application LNG as Storage Project [PDF, 701 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_03 describe each fee setting mechanisms [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_04 for fee setting mechanisms in 47_3 pls identify annual cost of transporting gas [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_05 will tgvi need to undertake a major expansion to provide firm transportation service to both duke and icp [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_06 if tgvi expansion is needed for 2007_2008 when will tgvi need to decide to go ahead [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_07 can bch confirm that any tgvi tsa will be needed to be approved [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_08 is bch aware that tgvi stated it will not proceed with expansion without long term commitment from customers [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_09 if no firm long term tsa with tgvi how does bch intend to provide gas supply for winter 2007_08 [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_10 further to 47_9 pls provide cost of alternative gas supply [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_11 if no bch firm contracts for winter 2007_08 is epa as a capacity resource in the public interest [PDF, 51 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_047_12 further to 47_11 pls discuss epa as a capacity resource for winter 2008_09 [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_01 did bch survey others to develop own model contract [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_02 pls file the study showing comparison of terms and conditions [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_03 how many wind biomass hydro gas and other contracts were used as epa and icp models [PDF, 52 Kb] | December 23, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_04 pls compare in table format each of the model epa and icp contracts terms financial security sellers rights [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_05 where epa financial assurances exceeds icp epa pls justify need for increased stringency [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_06 why was a subordinated mortage required [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_07 pls provide examples of development operating and capacity shortfall security were required [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_08 why did bch in addendum 10 change term from 10 to 25 years to a min of 25 years [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_09 have shorter terms than the 25 to 35 years of this epa been allowed for renewable sources [PDF, 50 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_10 what is bch estimate of costs to the extent that they are more stringent than the icp [PDF, 44 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_048_11 determine the value of incremental decremental strengthening of each of these provisions [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_049_01 why can bch not accept contracts of shorter terms than the 25 to 35 years specified [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_049_02 does contract term and unilateral renewal eliminate effective competition [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_049_03 has bch researched possible biomass projects to achieve 25 to 35 year fuel supply [PDF, 53 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_050_01 why does bch require unilateral rights to extend term withdraw renewal notice court actions [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_050_02 does bch agree that unilateral or one sided clauses make the epa less attractive to bidders [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_050_03 are epa renewal rights unilateral in favour of buyer [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_051_01 what is bch cost estimate for bilateral rights larger bonus for early completion green rights step in righ... [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_051_02 what steps did bch take to place value on each of provisions to determine ratepayer cost perspective to gr... [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_052_01 pls confirm payment for breach of this clause would be approx 30mm for the dpplp facility [PDF, 47 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_052_02 why unlike article 22_8_d are there no provisions for commercially reasonable efforts [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_052_03 pls provide bch view of what could constitute a breach [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_052_04 is bch not concerned that provisions could affect seller buyer ability to be candid in regulatory proceedings [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_052_05 has bch found similar provisions in model contracts if so include quantum of the potential liability [PDF, 45 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_053_01 why does buyer need to be involved to such an extent in monitoring construction and operations including o... [PDF, 48 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_053_02 article 6_2 seller to notify of every modification could create hundreds of items a month to report [PDF, 49 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
| BCUC IR 2_053_03 is article 6_2 a requirement of icp contract [PDF, 46 Kb] | December 20, 2004 |
